A Secret Weapon For difference between executive and non executive directors case laws
A Secret Weapon For difference between executive and non executive directors case laws
Blog Article
لاہور ہائیکورٹ نے قرار دیا ہے کہ پاکستان میں لوگوں کو جھوٹے مقدمات میں ملوث کر دینے کی شکایت عام ہے عدالت نے حکم جاری کیا ہے................
93 . Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi Coming for the main case, It's also a nicely-established proposition of law that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to reach a finding of fact or summary. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of the fact or evidence from the Stricto-Sensu, apply to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and conclusion receive support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty of the charge, however, that is issue for the procedure provided under the relevant rules and never otherwise, to the reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not work as appellate authority to re-appreciate the evidence and to arrive at its independent findings within the evidence.
Capital Punishment: Section 302 PPC gives for that death penalty given that the primary form of punishment for intentional murder. The offender can be sentenced to death as retribution for taking the life of another human being unlawfully.
Although there isn't any prohibition against referring to case regulation from a state other than the state in which the case is being listened to, it holds very little sway. Still, if there isn't any precedent within the home state, relevant case regulation from another state can be regarded as from the court.
The Pakistan Penal Code (PPC) is a comprehensive bit of legislation that defines many criminal offenses and prescribes corresponding punishments for those found guilty.
It allows individuals to research legal issues, understand their rights, and prepare for legal proceedings. This access is particularly important in Pakistan, where legal help might be expensive and tricky to get hold of.
Following the decision, NESPAK, as directed, conducted an assessment of the grid project and submitted that enough mitigation measures were in place to render any prospective adverse impacts negligible. Based on this, the grid station was permitted to become crafted.
Extra username and password are necessary for this resource. See Username and password webpage for details
In federal or multi-jurisdictional legislation systems there may exist conflicts between the assorted lessen appellate courts. Sometimes these differences will not be resolved, and it may be necessary to distinguish how the regulation is applied in one district, province, division or appellate department.
If granted absolute immunity, the parties would not only be protected from liability while in the matter, but could not be answerable in any way for their actions. important family law cases When the court delayed making this type of ruling, the defendants took their request into the appellate court.
Finally, a significant contribution of this case which was accepted for consideration via the Court under Article 184 (three), has actually been setting a precedent which allows for much simpler access for the public to strategy the superior courts plus the subordinate courts on environment related issues.
ten. Without touching the merits from the case on the issue of annual increases during the pensionary emoluments of your petitioner, in terms of policy decision on the provincial government, this kind of annual increase, if permissible in the case of employees of KMC, requires further assessment to be made with the court of plenary jurisdiction. KMC's reluctance because of funding issues and lack of adoption of provincial increases, creates a factual dispute that cannot be resolved in writ jurisdiction, demanding the petitioner to go after other legal avenues. Read more
13309-B of 2010 being weak types of evidence along with the evidentiary value whereof would be witnessed for the time of your trial. The investigation of this case has already been finalized and, Consequently, confirmed custody of the petitioner in jail is not going to provide any beneficial purpose at this stage.”
In determining whether employees of DCFS are entitled to absolute immunity, which is generally held by certain government officials acting within the scope of their employment, the appellate court referred to case law previously rendered on similar cases.